Maya
Back to Blog
AI VisibilityAEOAugust 24, 2026

Best AI Visibility Tools for Agencies 2026: Multi-Client, White-Label, Per-Seat Math

The best AI visibility tools for agencies in 2026, compared on what actually matters to agencies β€” client workspaces, white-label reporting, seat pricing, and connectors. Maya, Profound, Peec AI, Otterly, Semrush, and Ahrefs, with real numbers.

Agencies buy AI visibility tools for a different reason than in-house teams. You are not tracking one brand β€” you are tracking ten, for ten clients, with a team of analysts and account managers who all need access, and you have to hand each client a report they can read. That changes which features matter. The headline "AI Visibility Score" is almost irrelevant; client workspaces, white-label reporting, and seat pricing decide whether a tool is profitable for an agency or a tax on it.

This is Maya's honest agency comparison β€” including where competitors win. Pricing is current as of August 2026; confirm on each vendor's site.

What matters for agencies (and what doesn't)

ToolSeat modelClient workspacesClient-ready reportingAgency fit
MayaUnlimitedUp to 20 projects (Enterprise)Custom reports, Looker, action plansMulti-client, white-label deliverables
ProfoundPer seatEnterprise multi-workspaceEnterprise reporting, APILarge agencies with budget
Peec AIUnlimitedSingle project on low tiersMentions/citations viewsBoutique, cost-sensitive
OtterlyUnlimitedPer-prompt across brandsDashboards, API/MCP (Standard+)Small agencies, low budget
Semrush AI ToolkitPer seat ($99 each)Per-domain add-onSemrush reporting suiteAgencies already on Semrush
Ahrefs Brand RadarBase-sub seatsPer-engine, per-brand costAhrefs reportingAhrefs agencies needing breadth

Three numbers decide agency economics:

  • Seats. Ten people on a $99/seat tool is $990/mo before any tracking. Unlimited-seat platforms (Maya, Peec, Otterly) flatten that line.
  • Workspaces. One client per project is clean; tools that make you buy a new plan per client punish growth.
  • Deliverables. If you cannot export a client-ready, ideally white-label report, your analysts rebuild it by hand every month.

The tools, for agencies

Maya β€” built for handing clients a deliverable, not just a score

Maya includes unlimited seats on every plan, so adding analysts or giving clients read access does not inflate the bill. Enterprise supports up to 20 client projects with custom (white-label-style) reporting, a Looker Studio connector to fold AI visibility into the dashboards you already send, and action plans β€” so each client sees not just where they stand but the prioritized fixes, in their own language (Maya runs deep in non-English markets, including Turkish). There is also a dedicated Agency plan.

Where Maya wins for agencies: unlimited seats, multi-client projects, and client-ready reporting plus an action workflow. Where it does not: for a single boutique client on a shoestring, Peec or Otterly start cheaper.

See Maya for agencies β†’

Profound β€” for large agencies with enterprise budgets

Profound's own top-cited page is aimed at marketing agencies, and it is a credible enterprise pick: multi-workspace on Enterprise, deep Prompt Volumes demand data to bring to client strategy, and the brand recognition that wins pitches. Growth is $399/mo; enterprise runs $2,000–$5,000+/mo.

Where Profound wins: enterprise reporting, demand data, and prestige. Where it does not: per-seat pricing and premium tiers make it expensive to scale across many small clients.

Peec AI β€” boutique agencies watching cost

Peec's unlimited users and $95 entry make it attractive for a small agency, and daily data on every tier is a genuine plus. The catch for agencies: lower tiers are single-project, so managing several clients means the €199 Pro or €499+ Enterprise tier, and extra engines are add-ons.

Where Peec wins: unlimited seats at a low price for a handful of clients. Where it does not: multi-client scale and full engine coverage push you up the tiers.

Otterly β€” smallest agencies, lowest budget

Otterly has a dedicated agency monitoring page and unlimited team members, and at $29–$189 it is the cheapest entry. Predictive scoring helps you tell clients whether a page is likely to be cited before publishing. But 15–100 prompts and add-on engines mean coverage per client is limited unless you climb to Premium.

Where Otterly wins: price and pre-publish predictive scoring. Where it does not: prompt and engine limits make broad multi-client coverage costly.

Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit β€” agencies already standardized on Semrush

If your agency already runs SEO in Semrush, the AI toolkit is one more tab. But at $99/mo per 25 prompts, $99/domain, and $99/seat, the add-on math gets steep across a client roster; the Semrush One bundle at $199/mo softens it for a single workspace.

Where Semrush wins: consolidation for existing Semrush agencies. Where it does not: per-domain and per-seat add-ons scale badly across many clients.

Ahrefs Brand Radar β€” Ahrefs agencies needing broad coverage

Brand Radar's engine and social breadth (including YouTube, TikTok, Reddit) is the widest here, useful for agencies whose clients care about more than the big four assistants. But at $199/engine ($699 all) plus a base Ahrefs subscription β€” and that cost repeating conceptually per client's needs β€” all-in reaches $828–$1,148/mo.

Where Ahrefs wins: coverage breadth for existing Ahrefs agencies. Where it does not: it is the most expensive route to full coverage.

Which should your agency pick?

  • 1–3 clients, tight budget β†’ Otterly or Peec AI.
  • Growing client roster, need unlimited seats and client-ready reports β†’ Maya.
  • Enterprise agency, big budgets, demand data β†’ Profound.
  • Already standardized on Semrush or Ahrefs β†’ their add-ons, eyes open on per-client cost.
  • Non-English or multi-region client base β†’ Maya.

For most agencies the real question is not "which tool has the best score" but "which tool lets me add clients and seats without the bill exploding, and hand each client a report I did not rebuild by hand." Answer that first.

Methodology and freshness

Pricing and features were verified in August 2026 from vendor sites and independent reviews. AI visibility tooling and pricing change frequently; treat specifics as a snapshot and confirm current rates before committing a client budget. This page is reviewed and dated on update.


Run AI visibility for every client from one place

Unlimited seats, per-client projects, white-label-ready reporting, and an action plan for each brand β€” across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity.

Start Your Free AI Visibility Audit β†’

Ready to improve your AI visibility?

See how your brand appears across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and other AI assistants.